The Opportunity Cost of Mismanaging Leadership Hiring
Written By
Sarah Benson

Bringing her 18 plus years of expertise in talent identification Sarah and the team collaborate to support SMEs, and larger international organisations on their growth journey; transforming ambiguous profiles into tangible candidates. Sarah and the team excel at the convergence of cutting-edge tech and traditional industry.
I’ve been in this field for nearly 20 years, covering various industries: biotech, aviation, sustainable chemicals, energy systems, media and FMCG. The sectors change, but my focus has always stayed the same. I help companies grow by bringing the right people together. I’ve worked with scaling startups, listed corporates, and founder-led businesses. Again and again, I’ve seen how leadership hiring decisions either accelerate momentum or bring it grinding to a halt.
Recently, I’ve been reflecting more on leadership hiring from a global perspective. Conversations across Europe and the U.S. have highlighted some striking differences. In Europe, internal alignment is often prioritised. In the U.S., especially in venture-backed startups, I’m seeing a stronger appetite for bold external hires.
From recent calls, I’ve noticed that many U.S. startups are adapting quickly to economic uncertainty and political unpredictability. They are building leaner teams. They are also more decisive when it comes to appointing leaders who can make an immediate impact. These businesses understand the opportunity cost of hesitation.
Larger companies tend to be more risk-averse. They move more slowly. That might make structural sense, but it creates a vulnerability. I’ve seen strategic opportunities slip past simply because no one was in place to catch them.
One thing I notice again and again, especially in recent conversations with senior leaders, is the value of pausing to reflect. These conversations often go beyond the brief. They turn into mentoring-style dialogues, where leaders open up about their real challenges, their hopes for transformation, or what they are trying to protect inside their business. I’ve learned to trust my intuition in those moments. That gut feeling, paired with deep listening, often reveals the true nature of the hire. Not just what is on paper, but what is at stake.
Every company should ask itself five key questions before going to market:
- What are we truly hiring for? A job title or an outcome?
- Where are we going, and how will this hire help get us there?
- Why is this role critical now? Could we rethink or restructure?
- Who do we need, both in background and mindset?
- When do we need them in post? What is the cost of waiting?
Hiring senior leadership is one of the most critical decisions a business can make. Too often, companies either drag their feet or rush the process. Both approaches are expensive. The impact on revenue, team performance, and long-term growth is significant. Waiting too long or hiring the wrong person is a risk not worth taking.
The Cost of Delayed Leadership Hiring
Extended Vacancies Impact Performance.
Executive roles often take over 120 days to fill, primarily due to the specialised skills and experience required. During this period, the absence of leadership can hinder strategic initiatives and daily operations.
Financial Implications.
The average cost per hire is approximately £6,000 for typical roles. Executive-level hires come with much higher costs, starting at around £30,000 and reaching upwards of £100,000 depending on compensation structure and complexity. Prolonged vacancies inflate these costs further, while also risking revenue loss.
The Financial Impact of a Bad Hire Significant Financial Losses.
A bad hire can cost 30% to over 150% of the employee’s annual salary, depending on the position’s seniority. For executive roles, the financial and operational impact can be significant.
Productivity Decline.
A misaligned leader disrupts team dynamics. Productivity drops. Key employees may leave. The onboarding process alone can cost upwards of £4,000 per person. If the hire fails, that time and money is lost.
The Risks of Rushing the Hiring Process Increased Likelihood of Mis-Hires.
Rushing often means skipping the detail. Important fit factors are missed. A poor hire can cost over three times the employee’s salary once you include recruitment, lost momentum, and morale.
Cultural Misalignment.
A leader who doesn’t align with your values will struggle. Internal friction grows. Employee engagement dips. Turnover rises.
The Competitive Advantage of Strategic Hiring Enhanced Organisational Performance.
Businesses that take a structured, thoughtful approach to hiring are more likely to meet their goals and adapt to change.
Improved Employee Retention.
When leaders align with a company’s purpose and values, the result is stronger teams, higher engagement, and better retention.
The Solution: Partnering with a Leadership Search Expert (like me…)
Working with a leadership search expert brings real advantages.
Access to a Broader Talent Pool. I work in networks that go far beyond the active job market. The best people are often not looking.
Tailored Assessment and Cultural Fit. The search process is designed to understand what success looks like in your business. It’s not just about qualifications. It’s about mindset, fit, and future potential.
Balanced and Efficient Process. Good hiring is both fast and careful. My job is to deliver both. No shortcuts. No wasted time.
If you are considering a leadership hire this year, don’t wait too long to get started. Delays can get expensive very quickly. A thoughtful, well-executed process helps you find the right person to lead your next chapter of growth. That’s what I do best.
Speak to the team
Gibson Watts is a leadership recruitment and executive search company that is shaping a sustainable future for businesses and the planet.
(+44) 20 3880 0894